Thursday, February 14, 2008


Saddle up, Muchachos!

The congregation of St John's, Shaughnessy in the Diocese of New Westminster has voted to secede from the Anglican Church of Canada and join Greg Venables and the Province of the Southern Cone. The article from this morning's Vancouver Sun can be found here. Vancouverites are just getting up now - lazy sods - so you're hearing it here first!

Any article about St John's Shaughnessy will inevitably include the word 'wealthy' somewhere in its opening sentences. The 'Discover Vancouver' website slots it in nicely to its list of desirable 'Protestant Churches' along with a list of the various notables (like the mayor) who worship there or have worshipped there at some time. Those waving the flag for a 'yea vote' over the last few days have been quick to remind the infidel that St J-S is both/either a) the wealthiest church in the Anglican Church of Canada or b) the largest congregation in the ACC. Evidently this is an important datum.

Maybe they are maybe they aren't.

It's really no surprise. It's the penny that everybody was waiting to see drop. The Rector of the parish is a Moore College man from the Diocese of Sydney - SydneyAnglicans caught up with him in 2004 and asked him how things were going in Vancouver. The interview can be found here.

The congregation had stopped paying Diocesan assessments. Of late it's become the flagship for the discontented (J.I. Packer is a member there) and members of such congregations generally group together pretty uniformly.

Interesting article, though, about a one time president of Vancouver's branch of Integrity who is (or was?) a member of that congregation. The article is a few year's old so there's no telling what's become of him.

It's not a congregation that I've had any dealings with since I began to eat solid food although I was baptised there back in 1958. Women would have worn hats and gloves. My opinion on its future was not asked and I suppose that separation from the Anglican Church of Canada was not something in the cards in those days.

Michael Ingham was away from his desk at the time of the vote. Both Bishops Ingham (Diocese of New Westminster) and Cowan (Vancouver Island and the Gulf Islands only - called, confusingly, the Diocese of British Columbia - where I was ordained) have written to their clergy saying that any betrayal of their duty to safeguard the place of their parishes with the Anglican Church of Canada would result in the termination of their licences. Bishop Cowan's letter is somewhat blunter:

If a person is employed by the Diocese or the parish and is found to be acquiescing in or to be actively promoting such separation, this is a ground for immediate termination of employment without notice or severance.

Having seen a number of bishops of the Diocese of B.C. over the years regularly wearied and excoriated by the evangelical/charismatic mid-Island mafia, it's a wonder their patience hasn't reached the fraying point until now.

Watch this space.

A view from the inside.



And, an exclusive photo taken from inside the closed meeting which proves that people's minds were pretty well about joining the Southern Cone in spite of some furious last minute lobbying.

4 comments:

David MacKenzie said...

Personally, I think St. John's Shaughnessy has made the correct decision. And their choice shouldn't be dismissed by accusations of being a wealthy, uniform theologically, or "discontented" group. What cause have Christians to be "contented" with this world, anyway? And, to be fair, anyone whose bothered reading Michael Ingham's book "Mansions..." will know it is functioning out of a unitarian, relativistic worldview rather than a Christian one. It's time to separate. If Michael Ingham is right, then let the Lord bless his socks off. If Essentials is correct, then let the Lord honour those faithful enough to make the good confession.

But one thing is becoming increasingly obvious. Liberal theology and Biblical Christianity are completely incompatible. J. Gresham Machen was right...

Grace to you, in Christ Jesus,


Pastor David MacKenzie
Regency Christian Church
Devon, Alberta, CANADA
www.regencychurch.com

Raspberry Rabbit said...

David

I'm sure that the opinion from the independent church side of things is that such decisions are right and proper when situations of conflict arise. It's how independent churches spread out - part of their world view.

Blessings

RR

toujoursdan said...

Canadian law is pretty clear that one cannot "buy, sell or transfer" a parish without the bishop's permission. The "Diocese of New Westminster Act" dating back to the 1870s makes such a statement, which forms the basis of every parish's association with the diocese.

If that law is upheld the leaders of this parish will be out on their rears and the parish itself poorer due to legal costs. I have to wonder how informed the laity were about the consequences when they voted.

Even if Bishop Ingrahm has a "unitarian, relativistic worldview" as charged above, then he should be put on trial for heresy and found guilty or innocent by an ecclesiastical trial, rather than separation.

But the stated issue according to these parishes is whether same sex unions are permissible in the Anglican church, not Bishop Ingram's alleged theological views.

This action also speaks to the issue of whether the alleged sin of a diocese or ACC following a process that led to the approval same-sex blessings justifies the very real sins of theft of property, bearing false witness against opponents or the breaking of vows and contracts. I can't find where Jesus says two wrongs make a right in any of the Gospels and he seemed pretty clear on how we are supposed to treat enemies. Instead a rather relativistic form of morality itself seems to have driven this conflict throughout the Anglican church. At least the conservatives who left over divorced and women's ordination left the church honourably.

David MacKenzie said...

Dan, you can't preach about "dishonour" when the ACC has continued to flaunt its "radical inclusivism" in spite of Global Anglican objections.

If Ingham is wise, he'll let Shaughnessy go with the building intact (not that I expect it). The truth is St. John's Shaughnessy were already gone years ago, or rather, the Diocese of Westminster was.

So, bring on the Cone! This is what liberal schismatic theology accomplishes...